Peer review is vital to the quality of published research. Our Review process is based on double Blind Review Process.
In a 'Blind Review' scientific papers are evaluated by a group of experts from similar fields to make sure it meets the necessary standards for acceptance and publication.
We recommend peer double-blind review for all conference papers before publication.
The Conference’s Technical Program Committee, nominated by the Technical Program Chair, collaborates to review and discuss submitted papers. Review is done during a fixed window of time and all authors are notified of the decision on their paper at the same time. The Technical Program Chair is ultimately responsible for the selection of every accepted paper.
In double-blind, neither the author nor the reviewers are aware of each other’s identity. In this model, the anonymity of the reviewer ensures that the reviewer can give an honest and impartial evaluation of the paper. We use the single-blind review format.
Whether intentional or not, plagiarism is a serious violation. Plagiarism is copying ideas, text, data and other creative work (e.g. tables, figures and graphs) and presenting it as original research without proper citation. We define plagiarism as a case in which a paper reproduces another work with at least 20% similarity and without citation.
We are very serious about Plagiarism Content; we accept only original articles. The article may be rejected at any time if found plagiarized.
For more information refer IEEE page – A Plagiarism FAQ
If an author would like to post their papers electronically on any website, any FTP site, or any other electronic dissemination technique, they must include the IEEE Copyright notice on the initial screen displaying the IEEE-copyrighted material.